Anonymous User
Login / Registration

Gastroenterologie
a hepatologie

Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Gastroent Hepatol 2020; 74(2): 135–138. doi:10.14735/amgh2020135.

Endoskopická drenáž infikované ohraničené pankreatické nekrózy s komplikovaným průběhem – kazuistika

Diana Hexspoor Bawadekji1, Tomáš Tichý1, Ondřej Urban Orcid.org  2,3, Přemysl Falt Orcid.org  4,3

+ Affiliation

Summary

This report describes a 55-year-old patient, who was transferred from a regional hospital for acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis complicated by the development of large, infected, walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Because of severe septic shock with high perioperative risk and multiorgan failure requiring artificial lung ventilation, the patient underwent endoscopic transgastric drainage of the walled-off pancreatic necrosis using a metallic lumen apposition stent. Efficient drainage and repeated endoscopic necrectomy resulted in overall gradual improvements in patient condition. Due to the complete regression of fluid collection after 5 weeks the metallic stent was extracted. The patient was fully realimented and rehabilitated after 2 months of hospitalization and was transferred to ambulatory care.

Key words: acute pancreatits – drainage – endoskopy – pancreatic necrosis – stent

To read this article in full, please register for free on this website.

Benefits for subscribers

Benefits for logged users

Literature

1. Thoeni RF. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology 2012; 262 (3): 751–764. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110947.
2. Manrai M, Kochhar R, Gupta V et al. Outcome of acute pancreatic and peripancreatic collections occurring in patients with acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2018; 267 (2): 357–363. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002065.
3. Kliment M, Urban O, Fojtík P et al. Endoskopická drenáž pankreatických tekutinových kolekcií – 6-ročná skúsenosť v terciárním gastroenterologickom centre v období rokov 2006–2012. Gastroent Hepatol 2017; 71 (3): 199–207. doi: 10.14735/amgh2017199.
4. Rasch S, Phillip V, Reichel S et al. Open Surgical versus minimal invasive necrosectomy of the pancreas – a retrospective multicenter analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group. PLoS One 2016; 11 (9): e0163651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163651.
5. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307 (10): 1053–1061. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.276.
6. Akshintala VS, Saxena P, Zaheer A et al. A comparative evaluation of outcomes of endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79 (6): 921–928. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.032.
7. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J et al. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108 (9): 1400–1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218.
8. Al-Omran M, Albalawi ZH, Tashkandi MF et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): CD002837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002837.pub2.

Credited self-teaching test